You may have followed my advice I gave in an earlier posting to set up a secure email server that will allow clients to fetch their email from the server only if they present a valid SSL certificate in addition to the usual password for the mailbox user. The most appealing aspect of this approach is that once the system had been set up, the client user, who has already stored his certificate on his local laptop will just have to provide the password as usual. This solution comes with no additional burden, and at the same time ensures that the email travels encrypted from the email server to the laptop. A clear boost of security, fine.

The only problem is that the email client software must be capable of establishing a SSL connection using the users certificate. Unfortunately not every prominent email software is able to do that. In my case I fetch my email from the server with fetchmail as I'm interested to archive all incoming email.
But email software usually tends to fetch the email on its own account. So the lack of being able to establish a SSL connection could clearly ruin the new approach.

What's Written On The Tin?

As a consequence I was very surprised to learn that Evolution, generally being celebrated as the Outlook killer software, actually is one of those culprits. Googling towards a solution I came across some well-intended advice "just" to upload the my certificate using the pertinent buttons in Evolution. This is good advice although it requires a little bit of openssl hacking to beat the two separate cert and key files in shape to form a p12 file, but it doesn't solve the problem at all. Evolution uses uploaded certificates to sign messages a user sends to other people, but it still refuses to use such a certificate to establish a SSL connection to the mail server. Strange, but true.

Let The Expert Do The Connecting

Fortunately there is a small but powerful piece of software that is rapidly becoming my favorite tool in such situations, called STUNNEL. Its primary goal is to read data from one port and to connect to an entirely different port on a different computer, initiating a clean SSL connection with the certs and key provided in a single configuration file. From the remote server's perspective it looks like some SSL capable software had connected to the server, while indeed any dumb non-SSL-aware code is using stunnel to do the hard work. This code could as well be Evolution, right? Let's have a look at the simple config file for stunnel:


Essentially, the "normal" IMAP port 143 on the laptop is wired as a secure IMAPS mail server to be used by Evolution. All certs and keys are stored in a secure place on the laptop.

Getting Evolution To Use The Tunnel

The remote mail server mail.kerrylinux.ie would usually be listed as the server in the settings for "Receiving Email". Now you just have to replace this entry with the local laptop's name and make sure that "no encryption" is selected. Remember it is STUNNEL's job to perform the SSL encryption not Evolution's. "Yes, but it should be evolution's", I can hear you say. You're right, but even if the evolution team decides to sex up their software in future, this solution will work for every other non-SSL capable email client as well, and that's the reason why I told you how to do it.

After having installed an open source online-shop software on a VPS I had to suffer a hefty delay following the login as administrator until eventually the control panel appeared on the screen. Despite of this admin login problem the software ran fast and responsive, but the admin login, which would normally only take 2 seconds, took more than two minutes to complete.

Possible causes for this problem are manifold, some misplaced configuration option, a software bug, a missing software component, many things are conceivable. What raised my suspicion was the fact that this problem seems to occur only at the administrator login, well, I hadn't created new users by now. It is likely that the problem occurs for new users as well.

The Hunt

Actually there were two separate delays that cropped up after I typed the admin password, with a little bit of activity in between. It looked like a time-out, so I shut down the VPN's firewall and the problem was gone. At this point it was clear that some network activity took place which normally was blocked by the firewall. To find out what was going on I engaged a wonderful network analysing tool called wireshark or tshark to capture the network packets after login. It turned out that the VPN initiated a http and a second https connection to a server within the domain of the online-shop's original vendor.

I know it's only me who tends to think of a possible backdoor, a software "calling home" to report something, in such a case. But at this point I wanted to find out what was going on behind the scenes. Out of sheer curiosity I started to poke into the source code to find more informative evidence. As you may imagine, looking for "http" in the source code revealed tons of references that were mostly inactive links to the vendor's homepage. More extensive filtering brought a function "load_xml_file" to light that was used to download a file that contained only innocent version information in XML format that could as well be part of the distribution and stored locally.

Benefits of Open Source

The vendor had decided to download this file to make sure that the online-shop software will automatically become aware of a new version once it is released. Of course this is a legitimate intention, but it would force the shop user to open outgoing connections on the server machine to avoid the timeout penalty which could open up another can of worms for other applications. I decided to change the source code to load the information from local files instead of the vendor's homepage and turned on my restrictive firewall again.

This is exactly the flexibility and reliability one gets with using open source software which would never, ever be possible if you used proprietary solutions instead. People often say, nobody looks at the source code, which is true for many open source programs, but with proprietary products you would not even have the chance to take the approach described above, because you are at the vendor's mercy to accept what the program is actually doing.

The freedom to change the code is a benefit that could possibly not be overestimated.

On the last day of the year my email stopped coming in. You may have read about my approach to fetch my email using a secure tunnel that uses SSL certificates in addition to a password to access my email. Well, on the last day of the year my ROOT CERTIFICATE, which I use for Kerry Linux, had expired after five years. Time flies by.

As I had other plans for the days ahead I thought just to renew the root certificate to buy time, but it seemed that my attempts to renew my root certificate did not result in a new usable certificate to replace the old one. My user certs, which are not up for expiration yet could not be reanimated with a quick fix like that.

After a while I thought, there is a reason for that and I began to think about root certificates more thoroughly. In the past five years we've definitively seen the crackdown of MD5 and SHA-1 is not invincible, too. Would it not be prudent to increase the key length and to use a more secure (i.e longer) hash and go through the trouble of creating a new root key and issue new user certs? I decided to go along that route and created a fresh new CA root key with 4096 bits for the Kerry Linux Certification Center. Although my openssl software does only permit using SHA-1, which is a pity, I felt content and everything was up and running for me in an hour or so.

Re-Animation of the old ROOT KEY

After a while I began to wonder if it was possible to reanimate the old key and out of curiosity tried to explore the way to do it in more detail. I googled and found this nice posting from Arsen Hayrapetyan which led me to success. My former attempts to recreate the old certificate always led me to the following error message when I tried to verify a user's certificate::

Unable to get the issuer certificate? I supplied it in the command, but it didn't work out as planned.

So I followed Arsen's hints and created a testbed for an experiment, where I set the serial number back to 00 and emptied the file "index.txt" so that my new certificate could inherit the properties of the old one including its serial number. Then I created a new certificate request based on the old root certificate "cacert.cert" and used this new request to sign it with the old key.

The result was a new root certificate "cacert_renewed.pem" that verified my old user certs perfectly.

It's good to have an alternative, isn't it?

The XEN hypervisor uses big files (a couple of gigabytes) as filesystem images for virtual machines. Unlike other virtualisation solutions XEN does not impose its own internal structure on the image file. The big file simply has to contain an ordinary ext3 filesystem and, optionally, a partition table just as if it were a real hard disk. The ability to use big files as hard disks comes in handy if you are running short of space on your main hard disk. With an external hard disk you should be well prepared to run a number of virtual machines as big files. However, having the filesystem of a virtual machine in a big file raises the question of how to boot the virtual machine. Essentially there are two options to do that:

1. Provide the VM's kernel and the init-ramdisk, which are usually stored inside the filesystem (in the /boot directory), as separate files together with the big file, and modify the VM's configuration to use them.

2. leave the kernel and the init-ramdisk in the big file and provide a working boot sector that accesses the kernel inside the big file, using the native XEN pygrub bootloader to start the virtual machine.

Both options require that the big file must be associated with a real, special device file (i.e /dev/loop0) in order to create a filesystem on the big file. While for the first option it is sufficient to simply connect the big file with the loop device, using the "losetup /dev/loop0 bigfile" command, the second option is much more complex, as the big file has to be partitioned like an ordinary hard disk before the filesystem can be created.

For the rest of this article we will focus on the second option which is much more appealing as everything is kept inside the big file. I will show you how exactly the big file is turned into a virtual hard disk and how you can access and modify the information stored in the virtual machine's own filesystem.

Getting Partitions And Filesystem Sizes Sorted

Our journey through the big file's internal structure naturally begins with the creation of the big file.


As a second step we use this chunk of 4141875200 bytes to act as a hard disk and try to partition the bigfile as usual:


As expected, the fdisk program throws a number of error messages at us, because we have given a big file instead of a real hard disk to the program. But let's see how the fdisk program recognizes our new hard disk in detail
.
Obviously there is no partition table yet, but the program assumes that the big file represents a hard disk with 255 heads and 63 sectors of 512 bytes data each. Every cylinder of our virtual hard disk is made of 255 x 63 x 512 bytes = 8225280 bytes which represents the units in which we can chop the hard disk space into partitions now. All in all there are 503 cylinders in our virtual hard disk which makes a total of 503 x 8225280 bytes = 4137315840 bytes to spend on partitions.

But wait, didn't we create 4141875200 bytes in the first place? That's 4559360 bytes less than what we had originally. Well, this loss is due to the fact that for the 504th cylinder we'd need 8225280 bytes which we don't have, so this loss is inevitable. But the important consequence of this reduction of space is that we cannot create a filesystem on the whole bunch of data we supplied. At the moment the size of our filesystem is not determined at all. The next step is to create a new primary partition inside our big file using all the space we have:


After having written the partition table to the big file, have you checked for the new device file /dev/loop0p1? Don't worry, it does not exist! Adding p1 to the disk label is fdisk's way to denote partitions, that does not mean that you'll find such a thing in the /dev directory.

Poking Inside The Big File

From the partition table you can see that 4040316 blocks have been allocated for the new partition. With each block storing 1024 bytes we now know our first partition size, it's 4040316 x 1024 bytes = 4137283584 bytes. This is another number we never saw before! After having written off some 4.5 megabytes because we cannot use half a cylinder, we now face another loss of exactly 4137315840 - 4137283584 = 32256 bytes.

Of course these 32256 bytes at the beginning of the big file are there for a purpose, which is to store the partition table. Our first partition begins right after this amount of data, at an offset of 32256 inside the big file. The amount of 32256 bytes results from the fact that one track (63 sectors of 512 bytes for one head) are put away for the partition table. Now it's time to use a second loop device (/dev/loop1) to poke inside the big file at exactly the point where our first partition begins and create a new filesystem there:


It's essential that we supply the number of blocks as a parameter to the mkfs command to ensure, that our new filesystem on the first partition fits exactly in the space we have allocated. Without this parameter our filesystem would become too big, as the 4.5 megabytes after the first partition would be used for the filesystem too, and when the virtual machine is going to use the filesystem its actual size would conflict with the numbers in the partition table. Either the partition table or the filesystem's superblock is lying, which will cause distress for the virtual machine that expects a consistent filesystem to operate.

Writing The Master Boot Record

You can fill up the filesystem with whatever carefully selected quality open source software you can find on the planet, but in the end we need to write the new virtual disk's master boot record to boot the jewel. There is one step of preparation to be done before we can use the grub shell to write the MBR. We have to make a symbolic link named /dev/loop to the device that points to the master boot record, that is to the beginning of the big file, /dev/loop0 in the example above.


Now your spick-and-span virtual hard disk is ready to boot.